Skip to main content

Today in the stock market: Stocks climb on the back of stronger-than-expected GDP growth, while Tesla experiences a decline.

  Despite Tesla (TSLA) reporting disappointing earnings and a higher-than-expected US economic growth reading, US stocks climbed on Thursday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) gained 0.2%, the S&P 500 (^GSPC) rose 0.4%, extending its record streak from the previous day, and the Nasdaq 100 (^NDX) inched up about 0.6%.  The morning release of the advance estimate for fourth-quarter US gross domestic product (GDP) revealed a robust annualized growth rate of 3.3%, surpassing economists' expectations of 2%. Tesla, in its quarterly results, cautioned about a "notably" slower growth in electric vehicle production, missing profit forecasts. CEO Elon Musk expressed concerns about Chinese carmakers outpacing rivals in the absence of trade restrictions. Tesla shares plummeted up to 11%, marking a deeper decline compared to other tech-heavy "Magnificent Seven" stocks that have been propelling the S&P 500's surge. After-hours attention focused on Intel (INT...

Unpacking the Complex Regulations Regarding Mandatory Withdrawals from Retirement Funds

 


Unpacking the Complex Regulations Regarding Mandatory Withdrawals from Retirement Funds

This year, a perplexing tax requirement has become even more complex due to the new age for required minimum distributions (RMDs) from retirement accounts. Many older adults are unaware that they must begin withdrawing money from their retirement accounts in their early 70s and pay income taxes on those funds. This is the government's way of collecting taxes on retirement savings that have been growing tax-deferred for decades.


The confusion arises not only from the requirement itself but also from the shifting age at which it begins. For years, the RMD age was set at 70 ½, but changes in recent legislation have altered this timeline. The Secure 1.0 law of 2019 pushed the age to 72, and Secure 2.0 in 2022 raised it to 73, effective this year. Further changes are on the horizon, with the age set to increase to 75 starting in 2033.

Juan C. Ros, a financial advisor at Forum Financial Management in Thousand Oaks, Calif., notes, "We always get questions about this, and especially now because the age has increased two times now in four years."


Secure 2.0 provided a temporary reprieve for individuals turning 72 this year, allowing them to delay their first RMD until April 1, 2025. First-time RMD takers have traditionally had until April 1 of the following year to make their withdrawal, while others must fulfill their annual RMD requirement by year-end.


In summary, these changes affect those born in 1951 or later. Baby boomers born between 1951 and 1959 must start their RMDs at age 73, whereas those born in 1960 or later will face an RMD age of 75.

Brokerage firms typically keep track of legislative changes and advise affected clients on their annual RMD amounts, but there's a catch. Stacy Miller, a certified financial planner in Tampa, warns that brokerages are only aware of the money you have with them. Since RMD calculations are based on your total balance across all retirement accounts subject to the requirement, individuals with funds spread across multiple firms must perform this calculation themselves or seek assistance from an advisor.


Miller points out, "The custodian doesn't know about the other accounts, and the advisor might not know either."

Failing to withdraw RMDs can result in a penalty equal to 25% of the amount not taken (reduced from 50% pre-Secure 2.0), with the possibility of a 10% penalty reduction if the account owner promptly resolves the issue by taking the required amount.


For those who don't need their RMD for living expenses, there's an option to make a tax-free charitable donation of up to $100,000 (or up to $200,000 for a married couple filing jointly) to fulfill the RMD requirement. This qualified charitable distribution (QCD) is transferred directly from an individual retirement account to a qualifying charity and doesn't count toward the donor's taxable income. This can be beneficial for higher earners as it can help prevent them from moving into a higher tax bracket or paying income-adjusted Medicare premiums.


Notably, the age for QCDs remains at 70 ½ and hasn't been adjusted to align with the RMD age changes. This divergence adds to the confusion surrounding RMDs but also creates planning opportunities, as noted by Laura Jansen, a senior wealth advisor with Ironwood Investment Counsel in Scottsdale, AZ. Some clients have chosen to start their QCDs at 70 ½ to proactively reduce their IRAs and future RMDs while making charitable donations.

Laura Jansen remarks, "These changes were made, I think, to give more flexibility, but whenever there's change, even good change, it can cause confusion."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Deciding Between a $48,000 Lump Sum or $462 Monthly Payments: Navigating Pension Choices"

 "Decoding Pension Buyouts: Navigating the Road to Retirement" Pondering whether to take the lump sum or opt for monthly payments from your pension? You're not alone. Pension buyout decisions are becoming more commonplace, sparking a host of considerations for those with retirement plans. Let's break down the complexities and help you make an informed decision that aligns with your financial future. The Dilemma: Lump Sum vs. Monthly Payments When faced with a pension buyout offer, timing becomes paramount. The quandary lies in when you'll receive the payout and how long you anticipate living. A lump sum payout earlier in your retirement can significantly boost its overall value. Conversely, if you're in it for the long haul, monthly payments may accumulate into a more substantial sum over time. For instance, imagine being offered $48,000 to forgo a $462 monthly payment. If you're past a certain age, playing the percentages might lead you to lean towards th...

This relatively obscure Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) has surged by more than 50% in the last twelve months while continuing to maintain a solid 7.67% yield.

 Finding stocks that offer both capital appreciation and a generous dividend can often be a challenge for investors. Typically, high-yielding dividends are associated with stocks that have experienced significant declines in their share prices. However, imagine discovering a stock that not only presents a high-yielding dividend but has also outperformed all its competitors over the past 52 weeks, achieving substantial gains while distributing monthly dividends. Consider Modiv Industrial Inc. (NYSE: MDV), a Reno, Nevada-based diversified REIT managed internally, housing 44 single-tenant net-lease properties spanning 4.9 million square feet across 16 states. Among these properties, 39 are industrial, four are office spaces, and one is a retail property, housing 30 tenants. With a 100% occupancy rate and an impressive weighted-average lease term (WALT) of 14 years, this portfolio also features annual rental increases averaging 2.5%. Established in 2015, Modiv had its IPO in February 2...

The recently released stock portfolio update from the late Charlie Munger reflects his legendary investment strategy.

 Over a span of 15 years, the late Charlie Munger transformed Daily Journal's stock portfolio from nothing to $300 million. The recent release of the final portfolio update during Munger's tenure as chairman highlights his extraordinary patience, discipline, and conviction. Best known as Warren Buffett's right-hand man and vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway, Munger passed away at the age of 99 on November 28. He served as the chairman of Daily Journal's board for approximately 45 years, from 1977 to 2022. In the midst of the 2008 financial crisis, Munger made the strategic decision to allocate a portion of the company's funds into stocks and took charge of managing its investments. The first portfolio filing by Daily Journal dates back to the fourth quarter of 2013, likely triggered by the portfolio value exceeding the $100 million reporting threshold. The publisher and legal-software provider revealed holdings including 2.3 million shares of Bank of America, almos...